Medvedev calls for ranking system rethink to ease burden on players

Top players ​are obligated to compete in the ⁠four majors and eight Masters events, with the world rankings breakdown reduced from 19 to 18 tournaments in 2026 after ‌the men's body removed an ATP 500 commitment

Published - February 25, 2026 12:59 pm IST

Russia's Daniil Medvedev. File

Russia's Daniil Medvedev. File | Photo Credit: Reuters

Daniil Medvedev has called for a streamlined Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) calendar with only Grand Slams and Masters ​1000 tournaments offering ranking points, though the Russian concedes ‌such reforms would be difficult to implement.

Top players ​are obligated to compete in the ⁠four majors and eight Masters events, with the world rankings breakdown reduced from 19 to 18 tournaments in 2026 after ‌the men's body removed an ATP 500 commitment.

World number 11 Medvedev said that if smaller ‌events did not count towards the rankings it ‌would ⁠ease the pressure on players, who have ⁠criticised the 11-month calendar.

"That's the only way to make the tour shorter," Medvedev said. "It's never going to happen because there are ​licenses, and the ATP ‌won't have enough money to buy all of them.

"The other tournaments won't say, 'OK, we're out' because they would lose money. It's business. Right now with ‌how the ATP Tour is, it's never going ​to change, at least while I'm playing.

"Make it four Grand Slams, 11 Masters. The ⁠others, maybe make them without points." Reuters has contacted the ATP for comment. ATP chief Andrea Gaudenzi defended the calendar ‌in October, saying scheduling remained the players' choice.

Medvedev said players pushed themselves too hard to be one of the top eight to make the ATP Finals in Turin. He pointed to Holger Rune, who ruptured his Achilles in an ATP 250 event in ‌October.

"Everybody was like 'Yeah, but you don't have to play it', ​but if he wants to be in Turin, he has to, even if it's not ⁠a mandatory tournament," Medvedev said. "Last year I played seven ⁠tournaments in a row. Did I have to? No. I played bad at the beginning ‌of the year, maybe I can get 100 points here, 200. "If there would be no ​points, it's an easier decision.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.